The court clarified that R. v Devichand  Crim. L.R. 446 was not an example of a situation where a jury was introduced to extraneous material after it had retired, as the editors of Archbold implied, but that it was a case that had turned on its own peculiar facts.
ADDITIONAL CHARGES AGAINST CO-DEFENDANT NOT PURSUED
 EWCA Crim 481 March 19, 2013